PROPOSED PRACTICES AND APPROACHES FOR ADDRESSING SOURCES OF CONFLICT IN CROSS-CULTURAL AND CROSS-FUNCTIONAL IT PROJECTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56177/11icmie2023.51Keywords:
cross-cultural, cross-functional, conflicts, enhanced team charter, communication manifestoAbstract
IT projects are becoming more and more complex, requiring a culturally and functionally diverse mix of individuals [1] to be part of the project teams and acknowledging that investment in diversity (including cultural) should be a “future focus for the post-pandemic world” [2] . On top of this, there are a few takeaways from the COVID pandemic also. If we look at it through the perspective of what it meant for the projects that had to find a solution, then we think of projects that had to deliver a product in an unprecedented short time, with people working in different domains, even interorganizational or private sector working with public sector (academic centres and government).
If we look at it through the perspective of what it will mean from now on, we can say that during the COVID pandemic working remotely was a norm for the IT industry, so there was a big investment in improving the tools and processes that supported this and will continue to do so. In this context, where we foresee more and more cross-discipline, cross-functional and cross-cultural teams, we need to address the challenges of managing such a team, which could make the difference between failing fast or fostering innovation at its best. This paper`s central focus is the study of some of the biggest sources of conflict (when the IT project set-up involves teams that are cross-cultural and cross-functional) and addressing them in a more formal way, by proposing practices such as the use of an adapted team charter and a communication manifesto.
References
Ranf, Diana. (2010). Cultural Differences In Project Management. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica. 2. 18-18. 10.29302/oeconomica.2010.12.2.18.
PMI, 2020. A Case for Diversity: The ROI of Inclusion on Project Teams, s.l.: s.n.
Mariam, S., Khawaja, K. F., Qaisar, M. N., & Ahmad, F. (2022). Knowledge-Oriented Leadership, Team Cohesion, and Project Success: A Conditional Mechanism. Project Management Journal, 53(2), 128–145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211063128
Stoelsnesa, R. R., 2007. Managing Unknowns in Projects. Risk Management, 9(4), p. 271–280
Aza, H. T., 2018. Challenges and skills: Managing multicultural software project teams: A Case Study: Cross-Cultural Complexities and Interpersonal Conflict Faced by Project Managers in Multicultural Teams. s.l.:Editorial Académica Española.
Mullaly, M., 2021. Project HEADWAY: Cross-Discipline Project Management, s.l.: PMI.
Dalton, J. (2019). Project (Team) Chartering. In: Great Big Agile. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-4206-3_47
JOHNSON, WILLIAM. H. A., BAKER, DAVID. S., Dong, L., Taras, V., & Wankel, C. (2022). DO TEAM CHARTERS HELP TEAM-BASED PROJECTS? THE EFFECTS OF TEAM CHARTERS ON PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION IN GLOBAL VIRTUAL TEAMS. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 21(2), 236-260. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0332
Senabre, E., 2019. Adapting the scrum framework for agile project management in science: case study of a distributed research initiative. Heliyon, 5(3).
Schwaber, K. & Sutherland, J., 2020. The Scrum Guide - The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game. s.l.:s.n.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Conference of Management and Industrial Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.